Reply to comment

I don't see...

...how something functionally simillar is going to provide any advantage. In my opinion:

1. RPM==DEB==back-end package manager.
2. YUM==APT-GET==front-end to package manager that provides dependency management using meta-data features of the back-end.
3. Package-Kit==Synaptic==GUI for the front-end which makes it simple to use features through a GUI.

Now, if you find a feature missing in Package-Kit or Yum that is present in apt-get, it should be trivially easy to log a feature-request through appropriate bugzilla systems and get it included.

To me, on Fedora/Red-Hat systems, yum has always been better integrated with the RPM-backend and therefore the choice is moot. The choice, if I were to use Debian, would of course also be moot - it would be apt-get.

YMMV.

Reply

Please refrain from adding URLs to unrelated or commercial websites. This site is moderated and comments with inappropriate links are rejected. Thank you for your understanding.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options